• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Detecting microplastic contamination in water samples has become an essential task in environmental science as these tiny plastic particles pose growing threats to aquatic ecosystems and human health. Particles classified as microplastics measure less than five millimeters originate from a variety of sources including degraded packaging, man-made fibers, cosmetic items, and plastic resin beads. Their persistence in water bodies and ability to absorb toxins make them particularly hazardous. Standard approaches frequently use destructive chemical treatment and infrared or Raman spectroscopy, which are slow and necessitate high-end laboratory infrastructure. Imaging analysis offers a more accessible, scalable, and visually intuitive alternative for identifying and quantifying microplastics in water samples.

The procedure initiates with environmental sampling. Water is filtered through fine mesh filters, typically with pore sizes ranging from 0.5 to 8 µm, depending on the specific microplastic classification criteria. The retained particles are then transferred onto a transparent substrate, such as a membrane filter or microscope slide, for imaging. To improve visibility between synthetic and biological particles, samples may be applied with hydrophobic fluorescent stains, which attaches specifically to plastic polymers and emits light when exposed to targeted UV or blue light. Fluorescent labeling markedly reduces misclassification rates.

Precision microscopic imaging setups, including microscopy systems coupled with robotic slide translation, are used to acquire comprehensive visual recordings of retained fragments. These systems can scan entire filter surfaces and generate hundreds or even thousands of images per sample. Advanced software algorithms then analyze these images to detect and classify particles based on geometric form, dimensions, roughness, and light response. AI classifiers, calibrated using curated libraries of microplastic and background particles, can deliver reliable differentiation rates, reducing the need for manual inspection and minimizing human error.

A key strength of this method is its capacity to extract structural and positional information. Each morphotype—fibers, fragments, films, spheres—possesses identifiable visual signatures suitable for computational analysis. This allows researchers not only to count microplastics but also to infer their likely sources. An abundance of fibrous particles often indicates textile-derived pollution, while fragmented particles could indicate degradation of larger plastic waste.

To verify accuracy, detected particles are cross-checked with reference methods such as FTIR or micro-Raman analysis on a subset of detected particles. The dual-method workflow leverages imaging efficiency alongside spectroscopic confirmation, creating a robust workflow for large-scale monitoring.

False positives often arise from cellulose, chitin, or silicate particles, especially in diverse natural water systems. Biofilms, algae layers, or sediment adhesion may mask critical morphological traits. Ongoing improvements in image preprocessing, including noise reduction and edge detection algorithms, along with the use of multi-spectral and polarized light imaging, 動的画像解析 are helping to address current detection errors.

With rising public and scientific concern over microplastic contamination, the pressure mounts for uniform monitoring approaches. This method offers a viable tool for regulators, labs, and utilities to quantify exposure, map spread patterns, and test intervention efficacy. As robotic systems and machine learning models evolve, visual detection is set to define standard monitoring practices in freshwater and marine environments.