• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

False memory refers to circumstances in which people remember events in a different way from the best way they occurred or, in essentially the most dramatic case, remember events that never occurred in any respect. False recollections might be very vivid and held with high confidence, and it may be troublesome to persuade somebody that the memory in query is fallacious. Psychologists have studied false memories in laboratory situations through which events are effectively managed and it may be recognized precisely what transpired. Such experiments have uncovered a quantity of things which can be answerable for creating false reminiscences. In the following few paragraphs some of these factors will probably be reviewed. Sometimes the problem begins whereas the original event is still occurring, that is, while the memory is being encoded. If the notion of an event is inaccurate, then it can't be remembered accurately (The interested reader can link to attention-grabbing Scholarpedia items on categorical perception and occasion perception).

Consider the eyewitness who is asked to precisely remember a criminal offense; she may have seen the perpetrator solely briefly, at nighttime, from a distance, and while experiencing stress - all conditions that reduce her capacity to see him in the primary place, which will in flip dramatically scale back her later means to determine him. False memories may also arise from inferences made throughout an occasion. The witness to against the law is actively trying to figure out what's going on throughout the event, and uses prior information to make sense of what is going on. Likewise, the reader interprets brief tales while reading them, interpreting simple statements like "Nancy went to the doctor" differently if they know the character is anxious about pregnancy (Owens et al. 1979). In both instances, making use of knowledge adjustments what people remember; the witness may later remember the robbery as extra typical than it was and the reader will misremember the passage to be consistent with the pregnancy theme.

In another simple however highly reliable demonstration, folks hear an inventory of words like mattress, rest, awake, tired, dream, wake, snooze, blanket, doze, MemoryWave Official slumber, snore, nap, peace, yawn, drowsy. Later on, folks declare "sleep" was on the list, although it was not offered (Roediger et al. 1995). Humans are biased to extract that means from occasions (e.g., that the record accommodates sleep-associated words), and this will result in confusions about what was inferred versus what really happened. It can also result in forgetting of non-semantic particulars, since folks sometimes attend extra to meaning than to perceptual and phonological particulars. For example, most individuals fail when asked to draw a penny, regardless that they've handled 1000's of pennies; efficiently utilizing a penny does not require one to know the path of Lincoln’s head or the precise wording on the coin (Nickerson et al. Normally recollections are retrieved after time has passed, meaning that many events happen after a memory was saved.

Later occasions could interfere with retrieval of the original event; for example, Spanish discovered in school may come to thoughts when making an attempt to recollect one’s highschool French. The eyewitness could read newspaper accounts about a crime, answer investigator’s questions, speak to different witnesses, and imagine the event in her mind’s eye. All of these might yield representations that differ from what actually occurred, and these new recollections might block access to memories of these occasions. Consider a basic demonstration through which subjects watched a slide present of an vehicle accident, which included a slide showing a purple Datsun approaching a yield signal. Later, MemoryWave Official some members have been requested "Did another automotive go the crimson Datsun while it was stopped on the stop signal? " This query contained an incorrect presupposition (that there was a cease sign), and affected later memory. The subjects’ ability to identify the unique slide (depicting the yield signal) dropped after answering the misleading query (Loftus et al.