• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

In plant biology, plant memory describes the ability of a plant to retain information from skilled stimuli and respond at a later time. For example, some plants have been noticed to boost their leaves synchronously with the rising of the solar. Other plants produce new leaves within the spring after overwintering. Many experiments have been conducted into a plant's capability for memory, together with sensory, brief-time period, and lengthy-time period. Probably the most fundamental studying and memory features in animals have been observed in some plant species, and it has been proposed that the event of those basic memory mechanisms may have developed in an early organismal ancestor. Some plant species appear to have developed conserved ways to make use of functioning memory, and MemoryWave Official a few species may have developed distinctive ways to use memory function depending on their surroundings and life historical past. The use of the time period plant memory nonetheless sparks controversy. Some researchers imagine the perform of memory only applies to organisms with a brain and others believe that evaluating plant features resembling memory to humans and different higher division organisms may be too direct of a comparison.

Others argue that the perform of the two are essentially the identical and this comparison can serve as the basis for additional understanding into how memory in plants works. Experiments involving the curling of pea tendrils were a few of the primary to explore the concept of plant memory. Mark Jaffe acknowledged that pea plants coil around objects that act as support to assist them develop. Jaffe’s experiments included testing totally different stimuli to induce coiling habits. One such stimulus was the impact of light on the coiling mechanism. When Jaffe rubbed the tendrils in mild, he witnessed the expected coiling response. When subjected to perturbation in darkness, the pea plants didn't exhibit coiling habits. Tendrils from the dark experiment were introduced back into mild hours later, exhibiting a coiling response without any further stimulus. The pea tendrils retained the stimulus that Jaffe had offered and responded to it at a later time.

Proceeding these findings, the idea of plant memory sparked curiosity in the scientific neighborhood. The Venus flytrap could recommend one doable mechanism for memory. Venus flytraps have many tiny hairs alongside the trap's surface that when touched, set off the lure to shut. But the method requires more than one hair to be touched. In the late 1980s, Dieter Hodick and Andrias Sievers proposed a model for memory retention in Venus flytraps involving calcium concentrations. Comparing the phenomenon to human action potentials, they hypothesized that the first touch of a hair results in an increase of calcium within the cell, permitting for a brief retention of the stimulus. If a second stimulus doesn't occur shortly after the preliminary enhance of calcium, then the calcium stage is not going to surpass a certain threshold required to set off the trap to shut, which they likened to a memory being lost. If a second stimulus occurs quickly enough, then the calcium levels can overcome the threshold and set off the trap to shut.

This demonstrated a delayed response to an initial stimulus, which may very well be likened to brief-time period memory. While additional experiments supported short time period retention of indicators in some plant species, questions remained about long run retention. In 2014, Monica Gagliano performed experiments into long-term plant memory using Mimosa pudica, a plant distinctive for its ability to curl its leaves in defense in opposition to touching or shaking. In Gagliano’s experiment, the plants were repeatedly dropped from a prescribed top, shaking the branches and eliciting a protection response. Over time, Gagliano noticed a lower in leaf curling in response to being dropped. But when shaken by hand, MemoryWave Official the plants nonetheless curled their leaves. This appeared to indicate that the plants were still capable of the defense response, but that they remembered that the dropping stimulus didn’t pose a threat of herbivory. Gagliano then tested to see how lengthy the plant might retain the knowledge for.

She waited a month after which repeated the dropping experiment with the identical people from the earlier experiment. She observed that the plants had seemingly retained the memory of not needing a defense response when dropped. Gagliano's work suggested that some plant species could also be able to learning and retaining information over extended periods of time. In 2016, Gagliano expanded on her work in plant memory with an experiment involving the frequent garden pea, Pisum sativum, which actively grows in the direction of light sources. Gagliano established a Y-maze job with a mild and a fan and placed each pea plant into the task. Gagliano noticed that when younger pea plants were grown in a Y-maze process where the sunshine supply got here from the identical direction as a fan, that when the pea plants were positioned into a Y-maze job with solely a fan, the pea plants grew in the course of the fan. It appeared that the pea plants had learned to associate the fan with gentle.